Retail Crime
Selaine’s response:
I know that the Government legislated to introduce a statutory aggravating factor for assault against any public facing worker via section 156 of the Police Crime Sentencing and Courts Act 2022. This ensures the public facing nature of a victim’s role will be considered an aggravating factor when it comes to sentencing for assault offences.
I also welcome the further steps the Government is taking as part of the Retail Crime Action Plan. This plan includes a police commitment to prioritise urgently attending the scene of shoplifting instances involving violence against a shop worker, where security guards have detained an offender or where attendance is needed to secure evidence. I understand that police attendance will be assessed based on risk, and prolific or juvenile offenders will be treated with elevated priority.
I am aware that as part of the plan, police have also reaffirmed their pledge to follow up on any evidence that could reasonably lead to catching a perpetrator. Forces will step up targeted hotspots in badly affected areas. The plan also sets out advice for retailers on how to provide the best possible evidence for police to pursue in any case. Retailers should send CCTV footage of the whole incident, and an image of the shoplifter from the digital evidence management system, as quickly as possible after an offence has been committed.
Further, the Home Office has created a new business and policing partnership that will radically improve the way retailers are able to share intelligence with policing, to better understand the tactics used by organised retail crime gangs and identify more offenders. This will include development of a new information sharing platform and training for retailers.
I can assure you that the Government is committed to keeping retail workers safe and cracking down on shoplifting.
February 2024
Rwanda Scheme
Selaine’s response:
I welcome that the Government is making significant progress in stopping the arrival of small boats, with crossings down by a third. This year, the Government has prevented 22,000 crossing attempts, seen the small boats deal with Albania lead to a 90% fall in crossings, and cut the asylum legacy backlog by more than 59,000 cases. Being able to remove asylum seekers to Rwanda is an essential deterrent and part of our full toolbox to stop the boats.
I understand that the Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeal which means that the Government cannot yet remove people to Rwanda. I can assure you that the Government does respect the Supreme Court but its judgment does not weaken the resolve to deter people from making these illegal, dangerous and unnecessary journeys.
The Supreme Court judged that the Rwanda policy requires a set of changes to be lawful. As such I welcome that the Home Secretary has signed a new joint treaty with his Rwandan counterpart to strengthen the UK and Rwanda's Migration and Economic Partnership and directly addressing the concerns of the Supreme Court. The agreement is part of the Government's plans to ensure that illegal migrants can lawfully be relocated to Rwanda under the Government's ambition to stop the boats, ensuring people know that if they come to the UK illegally, they cannot stay here. The landmark treaty is binding in international law and ensures that people relocated to Rwanda under the partnership are not at risk of being returned to a country where their life or freedom would be threatened, an act known as refoulement.
I am aware that to further bolster assurances that relocated individuals will not be returned, under the treaty, Rwanda’s asylum system will be strengthened through a new appeal body.
The appeal body will consist of a Rwandan and other Commonwealth national co presidents, and be composed of judges from a mixture of nationalities with asylum and humanitarian protection expertise, appointed by the co presidents, to hear individual appeals. Further, this treaty comes together with new legislation that has been introduced to Parliament which will enable Parliament to confirm that, with this new treaty, Rwanda is a safe country.
Those who come here illegally, in the main, should not be able to remain.
January 2024
Rise in Immigration and Nationality Fees
Selaine’s response:
I understand that the Government is preparing full economic impact assessments for the increases to the Immigration Health Surcharge (IHS) and the immigration and nationality fees. The IHS rates have not increased since 2020 and the cost of providing public services has increased in that time. As such, it is right that the Government keeps the IHS level under review to ensure it reflects the genuine cost to the NHS for providing healthcare to those who pay for it.
October 2023
Credit Their Service Campaign
Selaine’s response:
My ministerial colleagues and I recognise the sacrifices made by the brave men and women who serve in our Armed Forces, which is why this Government has done more for veterans than any of its predecessors.
Many veterans have access to a number of pension benefits and, in the unfortunate event they face injury when serving, compensation schemes too. War pensions and Pension Credit are both designed to help with day-to-day living costs, however, in recognition of the sacrifices made by members of His Majesty’s forces, £10 per week of any such pension is ignored in the calculation of a Pension Credit award. This is a more favourable approach than to other forms of income, such as a personal pension.
It is my view, and that of this Government, that the best way to ease cost of living pressures is to tackle inflation. To this end, the Chancellor has put forward a plan to halve inflation this year and lay the foundations for long term growth to improve living standards for everyone, including veterans and personnel. In addition, all households, including veterans, can access an unprecedented package of support to help with the cost of living, including through the Energy Price Guarantee, cost of living payments and council tax rebate, as applicable to their location and personal circumstances.
The Defence Discount Service (DDS) provides savings and discounts for members of the Armed Forces, veterans, and defence community.
August 2023
Detention of Pregnant Asylum Seekers
Selaine’s response:
I appreciate the concern that people have for female asylum seekers who are in a vulnerable position, however, the Government has been clear that we cannot allow a system which incentivises people, including women and children, to risk their lives and pay people smugglers to come here illegally.
This system is neither compassionate nor fair, which is why the Illegal Migration Bill will end illegal entry as a route to asylum in the UK, breaking the business model of people smuggling gangs and restoring fairness in our asylum system. It will ensure anyone arriving via small boat or other dangerous and illegal means will be in scope for detention and swiftly removed. However, I have been assured that appropriate healthcare provision will be provided for all those in immigration detention.
July 2023
Illegal Migration Bill
Selaine’s response:
The volume of illegal small boat arrivals has overwhelmed our asylum system. The asylum system currently costs the British taxpayer £3 billion a year, and since 2018, some 85,000 people have illegally entered the UK by small boat. This is why stopping the boats was one of the five promises the Prime Minister made to the public in January. The new Illegal Immigration Bill will fulfil this promise and means that someone who enters this country illegally will be swiftly detained and removed back to their home country if it is safe, or to a safe third country such as Rwanda. This will help the break the business model of people smuggling networks, and ultimately save lives.
I can assure you that as we reduce illegal migration, the Government will do more to help the most vulnerable through safe and legal routes as it has done for Syria, Afghanistan, Hong Kong and Ukraine. Since 2015, the UK has offered safety to nearly 480,000 people from all over the world. While supporting the most vulnerable, the Bill will introduce an annual cap, to be determined by Parliament, on the number of refugees the UK will accept, once illegal migration is under control. In conjunction with local authorities, this will allow the Government to take into consideration local capacity for accommodation, public services and support.
This Government is rightly proud of the world leading modern slavery legislation we ourselves introduced, but we must be honest that the system is being abused by people with no right to be here, determined to frustrate their removal from the UK. When our Modern Slavery Act passed, the impact assessment envisaged 3,500 referrals a year. Last year, there were 17,000 referrals, which took on average 543 days to consider. The most referred nationality in 2022 were citizens of Albania, a safe European country, signatory of European Convention on Action against Trafficking, and a NATO ally. In 2021, 73% of people who were detained for removal put forward a Modern Slavery claim, compared to just 3% of those not in detention. Finally, just 6% of detentions ending in 2019 involved a modern slavery referral, rising to 53% in 2020, and to 73% in 2021. This is not sustainable, and the generosity of the public is being undermined by the abuse. If someone is found to be a genuine victim of modern slavery, meaning they been trafficked to the UK against their will, we will ensure they are safely returned to their home country or another safe country like Rwanda.
This Bill will ensure that we have a safe and fair immigration system, which will continue to help the most vulnerable.
March 2023
Missing Unaccompanied Migrant Children
Selaine’s response:
I am aware that the rise in small boat crossings to the UK has placed a significant strain on the asylum accommodation system. As such, the Home Office currently has no alternative but to temporarily use hotels to give some unaccompanied minors a place to stay while the local authority finds them accommodation.
I can assure you that the Government takes its safeguarding responsibilities very seriously and there are procedures in place to ensure all under 18s are accommodated as safely as possible while in hotels. This includes personnel who provide 24/7 supervision, with support from teams of social workers and nurses. Further staff, including contractors receive briefings and guidance on how to safeguard minors, and all children receive a welfare interview. The movements of under 18s in and out of hotels are also monitored and recorded, and they are accompanied by social workers when attending organised activities.
The Home Office does not have power to detain unaccompanied asylum seeking children in these settings and we know a small number do go missing. When any child goes missing, a multi-agency missing persons protocol is mobilised alongside the police and the relevant local authority to establish their whereabouts and to ensure they are safe. Many of those who have gone missing are subsequently traced and located.
More broadly, the Government has made clear the use of hotels must end as soon as possible. I welcome that the Home Office is providing local authorities with children’s services with £15,000 for eligible young people they take into their care from a dedicated UASC, unaccompanied asylum seeking children, hotel, or the reception and safe care service in Kent.
I can assure you that safeguarding concerns for unaccompanied minors are, and will remain a priority for the Government. I am glad that reforms are being introduced to ensure that there is a fair and effective asylum system that works in the interests of the British people.
February 2023
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
Selaine’s response:
While it is Government policy not to comment on whether or not a group is under consideration for proscription or not, I thought it may be helpful to set out the legal basis on which proscription decisions are made.
Legislation allows for a group to be proscribed in the UK only if the Secretary of State believes it is currently concerned in terrorism, as defined in the Terrorism Act 2000. This means an organisation can only be proscribed if it commits or participates in acts of terrorism, prepares for terrorism, promotes or encourages terrorism (including the unlawful glorification of terrorism) or is otherwise concerned in terrorism.
Proscription sends a strong message that terrorist organisations are not tolerated in the UK and deters them from operating here. It is a criminal offence to be a member or supporter of the organisation, with a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison and/or an unlimited fine. It is also a criminal offence for a person to display or publish an article or item of clothing in such a way or in such circumstances to arouse a reasonable suspicion that they are a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation. This could lead to up to 6 months in prison, and/or a £5000 fine.
Organisations which cause concern are kept under continuous review. As and when new material comes to light it is considered and the organisation reassessed as part of that process. The investigation and prosecution of proscription offences is a matter for the police and Crown Prosecution Service.
June 2022
Processing Asylum Claims in Rwanda
Selaine’s response:
The UK has a proud record of providing support to those in need of protection; our resettlement programmes have provided safe and legal routes to better futures for hundreds of thousands of people from across the globe. Since 2015, over 185,000 adults and children seeking refuge have been offered a place in this country, more than any other similar resettlement scheme in Europe. This includes almost 100,000 British Nationals Overseas in Hong Kong, 20,000 Syrians, 13,000 from Afghanistan and 50,000 Ukrainians. However, it is clear that the global asylum system is broken. Some 80 million people are on the move around the world, uprooted by conflict and instability. Many more are on the move to seek better prospects, driven by a desire for a better life. The result is increased illegal migration flows, including into Europe and onto the UK, with the asylum systems collapsing under the strain of real humanitarian crises and the work of people smuggling gangs. Whilst here in the UK we want to help as many people as possible, we of course unilaterally cannot be expected to house all of the people who are currently seeking to settle here.
As a result of the UK's Migration and Economic Development Partnership with Rwanda, people who enter the UK illegally may have their asylum claim considered in Rwanda, not in the UK, with a view to receiving the protection they need there if their claim is successful. It is particularly encouraging that the Home Office has begun issuing formal removal direction letters to those who are set to go to Rwanda where they will be able to rebuild their lives in safety. Officials are now speaking with all individuals to ensure the process is fully understood and people are given the appropriate support ahead of departure.
The UK is investing £120 million into Rwandan economic development and growth, with funding also provided to help deliver asylum operations, similar to the costs incurred in the UK. Furthermore, Rwanda has one of the fast-growing economies and enterprise cultures, with growing trade links with the UK, which this scheme will complement as part of our Global Britain agenda.
Rwanda is a fundamentally safe and secure country with respect for the rule of law. Additionally, Rwanda has no laws against homosexuality, and its constitution also prohibits all forms of discrimination based on identity. Under this agreement, Rwanda will process claims in accordance with the UN Refugee Convention, national and international human rights laws, and will ensure their protection from inhuman and degrading treatment or being returned to the place they originally fled.
Rwanda has a credible track record of hosting refugees and working constructively with the UN Refugee Agency to provide food, healthcare and jobs with over 130,000 refugees recently resettled in the country.
Combined with asylum reforms and legal changes through the Nationality and Borders Act, these new measures will hopefully deter illegal entry into the UK. In doing so they will help break up criminal smuggling gangs, protect the lives of those they endanger, ensure continued support for the truly vulnerable, and enhance our ability to remove those with no right to be in the UK.
June 2022
Jamaica
Selaine's response:
The people of North Devon rightly expect that I would support measures which remove those who have no right to be in the UK, including dangerous foreign criminals.
The Home Secretary is required by the UK Borders Act 2007 to deport any foreign national who has received a custodial sentence of at least 12 months and those convicted of serious crimes, are persistent offenders or who represent a threat to national security, unless a specified exception applies.
It is also the case that the UK only deports those whom the Home Office or courts, when a legal claim is raised, are satisfied do not need protection and have no legal basis to remain in the UK. I welcome the fact that every individual who meets the threshold for deportation is given access to legal advice and support and importantly has an opportunity to challenge their removal through the legal system.
The UK is one of the few countries in the world providing support to help people re-integrate upon their return. For example, the Home Office supports two non-governmental organisations in Jamaica who provide re-integration support to those who are deported. They provide initial support to those who may not have anyone to meet them at the airport or who need transport. They are also able to help with short-term accommodation for those without a place to stay. In the longer term, they can provide training, including recognised qualifications, to enable individuals to find employment and help with obtaining documentation.
May 2022
Modern Slavery (Children)
Selaine’s response:
I am committed to supporting victims of modern slavery to help them recover from their exploitation and to support the prosecution of their exploiters. There is also a clear duty on the Government to safeguard and protect child victims of such appalling abuse.
I am encouraged individuals responsible for supporting child victims are professionals who use their discretion and a trauma-informed approach. I have been assured that they fully understand and appreciate the experience of those children and will ensure that they get the right support and approach to rebuild their lives. Furthermore, I remain incredibly supportive of the work the Home Office is doing, through Independent Child Trafficking Guardians (ICTGs), to support the welfare of child victims.
ICTGs provide an additional source of advice and support for all trafficked children. A key part of the role includes one-to-one support for those children who lack a figure of parental responsibility for them in the UK. The ICTG regional practice co-ordinator works alongside statutory bodies such as the police, social workers and the wider criminal justice system to build a multi-agency approach to the safeguarding of these vulnerable children. It is encouraging that, as of December 2021, the Home Office has rolled out ICTGs in two thirds of local authorities across England and Wales.
It is, however, right that the Government is taking steps, through the Nationality and Borders Bill, to ensure the system is protected from abuse. I therefore welcome the Home Office's decision to put the current statutory guidance related to protection from removal for potential victims of modern slavery on a legislative footing. This will set out where the recovery period (during which time potential victims can access support) and protection from removal may be withheld, specifically on the grounds of public order, improper claims and multiple recovery periods, in specific circumstances.
Of course, it is right that victims of modern slavery should be entitled to certain protections and support to enable their recovery. Any decision to withhold protections from an individual will be balanced with the priority to safeguard vulnerable victims.
May 2022
Asylum Seekers and Refugee Resettlement
Selaine’s response:
I am aware that a number of constituents have written to me calling on the Government to introduce a specific commitment to resettle a set number of refugees each year. While I sympathise with the sentiment behind this suggestion, I do not think imposing a numerical target is the best method of aiding those in need. Instead, I believe the number of refugees settled each year should be based on the UK's capacity and the Government's assessment of the international situation. Operating in this way has already effectively enabled the UK to respond to both protracted and emerging humanitarian crises.
For example, I would like to point to the work the UK is doing to support those fleeing Afghanistan by providing resettlement of up to 20,000 people in need of protection. In addition, the Government's launch of two uncapped pathways in response to the crisis in Ukraine is continued evidence of the UK's willingness to adapt to respond to international crises and support higher numbers of refugees and people in need of protection on a bespoke basis.
Since 2015, the UK has resettled over 27,000 refugees through safe and legal routes directly from areas of conflict and instability. Furthermore, the refugee family route, which enables the spouse or partner and children of a refugee sponsor who are under 18 years of age to join their family member in the UK, has provided more than 39,500 family reunion visas from the same year.
I have always believed that resettlement is vital as a safe and legal pathway to protection for vulnerable refugees fleeing persecution. It is right, and I will continue to ensure, that the Government continues to offer safe pathways for those in need. The launch of a new global UK Resettlement Scheme will build on the success of previous schemes and continue our proud record of resettling refugees who need our help from around the world.
Rest assured that the Nationality and Borders Bill will allow the UK to continue to resettle genuine refugees directly from places of danger and to offer refugee family reunions. It will improve support for refugees to help them build their life in the UK, integrate and become self-sufficient members of society. The Bill also seeks to introduce a new temporary protection status for those who do not come directly to the UK or claim asylum without delay once here, but who have, in any event, been recognised as requiring protection.
May 2022
Differential Treatment of Refugees
Selaine’s response:
The United Kingdom has a proud history of supporting those in need of protection; our resettlement programmes have provided safe and legal routes to better futures for hundreds of thousands of people from across the globe. Since 2015, over 185,000 men, women and children seeking refuge have been offered a place in this country, which is more than any other similar resettlement scheme in Europe.
This includes almost 100,000 British Nationals Overseas threatened by draconian security laws in Hong Kong, 20,000 through the Syrian scheme, 13,000 from Afghanistan, and around 50,000 Ukrainians.
The purpose of the power to differentiate, being introduced through the Nationality and Borders Bill, is to influence the choices that migrants may make when leaving their country of origin, seeking to encourage them to claim asylum in the first safe country they reach and discourage them from travelling to the UK by means of dangerous journeys and instead use safe and legal routes.
The powers to differentiate, as set out in the Bill, are not prescriptive and the Secretary of State is under no compulsion to use them, which provides for flexibility in the fair and lawful implementation of the provisions. Differentiation may relate to length of leave, requirements for settlement, family reunion, and recourse to public funds.
I would like to reassure you that the proposals in the New Plan for Immigration and the Nationality and Borders Bill fully comply with the UK's global obligations including commitments to the European Convention on Human Rights and the UN Refugee Convention. As you will be aware, through the Bill, whether people enter the UK legally or illegally may also have an impact on how their asylum claim progresses, and on their status in the UK if that claim is successful. After looking into this, the UN Refugee Convention does allow for different treatment where, for example, refugees have not come directly from a country of persecution. For example, if someone enters the UK via a safe country, where they could have claimed asylum, they are not seeking refuge from imminent peril. Therefore, returning them to a safe third country is not inconsistent with the UN Refugee Convention.
Under the provisions in the Bill, therefore, those who meet the terms of the refugee convention will be granted refugee status. There is no question of this clause making it harder to be a refugee or otherwise enabling the Government to refuse refugee protection to those who need it. That is simply not true. What the clause does is enable the Secretary of State to distinguish between refugees based on whether they came directly and claimed without delay, but anyone considered under this policy will be a refugee.
May 2022
Ukrainian Refugees
Selaine’s response:
I am appalled by the conduct of Putin’s expansionist regime. The Russian attack on the Ukraine is an unprovoked and anti-democratic act of aggression. I am proud that Britain is actively seeking to assist Ukraine in every aspect of this conflict. Ministers have assured me that they continue to keep the Government’s handling of the situation under review as it develops.
I am especially troubled by reports that desperate Ukrainians who have left their homes have struggled to access the generous support provided by the Government. It is vital that they can do so as quickly as possible and I welcome that the Minister for Safe and Legal Migration has continued to keep Parliament updated on the progress of the UK's humanitarian offering as it develops. Application forms have been simplified to make it quick and easy to use, the Home Office has increased capacity in Visa Application Centres across Europe, following advice from security and intelligence agencies that it was safe to do so, the need for biometrics to be taken from those with valid Ukrainian passports before arrival in the UK has been removed, allowing the vast majority of applicants to apply entirely online. I have also been assured that Ministers regularly monitor the schemes' operational performance, bringing in additional caseworkers to ensure Ukrainian applications are prioritised.
Security and biometrics checks are a fundamental part of the UK’s visa approval process. Given the acute security challenges in Ukraine, Russian efforts to infiltrate and merge with Ukrainian forces, the presence of extremists on the ground and Putin’s willingness to use violence on British soil, it is right that the Government continues to protect the public by maintaining these vital checks. This is a policy that has been retained consistently throughout all emergency evacuations, including in Afghanistan.
I am, however, reassured that the Government will no longer require Ukrainians with passports to go to a Visa Application Centre to give their biometrics before they come to the UK. Instead, once their application has been considered and appropriate checks have been completed, they will receive direct notification that they are eligible and can come to the UK. In short, Ukrainians with passports will be able to get permission to come to the UK fully online and will be able to give their biometrics once in Britain.
Our friends in Poland remarkable refuge to Ukrainians crossing the border. The UK Government continues to pour aid and support into Poland, to help ensure Ukrainian refugees are safe in Poland whilst Visa applications are processed.
In a statement with his Canadian and Dutch counterparts on 7 March, the Prime Minister underscored the importance of addressing all forms of violence against women in, or fleeing from, Ukraine. I am confident that the UK Government will do all it can to this end in light of its historic lead on this issue. The Foreign Secretary recently announced financial support for organisations working with survivors of conflict-related sexual violence in Ukraine.
Having spoken with my ministerial colleagues, I have been informed that the position of the Ukrainian Government is quite clear: any Ukrainian child who is currently outside Ukraine may not be adopted or placed in the care of foreigners without the consent of Ukraine. I do, however, welcome the fact that the Home Secretary has, after working directly with the Ukrainian Government, secured permission to bring children from the charity Dnipro Kids who had been caught up in Vladimir Putin’s brutal invasion of Ukraine to the UK.
April 2022
Lord Dubs' Amendment (Nationality and Borders Bill)
Selaine’s response:
I am proud to support the Government’s efforts to reform our immigration system to retain its compassionate approach but combining it with increased fairness, firmness and efficiency.
Lord Dubs’ amendment to the Nationality and Borders Bill (which relates to safe routes for those seeking to claim asylum in the UK, including unaccompanied children, to travel from countries in Europe to join family in the UK), while well intentioned, would actually prove detrimental to the interests of vulnerable children and encourage young people to make dangerous journeys.
For example, regarding the best interests of vulnerable children, the amendment fails to consider the individual needs of children which raises significant issues. It creates entitlements to come to the UK to claim asylum if the individual has the specified UK relatives but does not consider whether this is in the unaccompanied child’s best interests. Neither does it consider whether the UK relative can actually take care of the child, nor does it involve any consideration of whether the child would be better placed with a relative, potentially an even closer relative, in another European state.
Furthermore, I cannot ignore the fact that this new clause would encourage asylum seekers, including vulnerable unaccompanied children, to make dangerous journeys to Europe (facilitated by smugglers and traffickers) to benefit from its provisions. By the same token, it would discourage asylum seekers, when in Europe, who wish to travel to the UK to interact with the care and support mechanisms or the asylum systems of those safe European countries which should provide them with the safety and protection they are entitled to under the same international legal obligations that the UK abides by.
It is vital to keep in mind that European member states are safe countries with international obligations towards protecting asylum seekers and children, as we do here in the UK, affording all asylum seekers in Europe an opportunity to access the rights to which they are entitled.
I hope with this response I have been able to outline why I am unable to support Lord Dubs’ amendment.
March 2022
Asylum Support and Employment
Selaine’s response:
I recognise that this is a very important issue; the UK has a proud tradition of providing a place of safety for refugees. Each claim for asylum is carefully considered and where it is found that individuals are in need of protection, asylum is given, with the ultimate aim of helping them to return home if it is safe to do so.
Asylum seekers are allowed to work, in jobs on the Shortage Occupation List, if their claim has not been decided after 12 months through no fault of their own. The current policy aims to strike a balance between being equitable towards asylum seekers, while considering the rights and needs of our society as a whole, prioritising jobs for British citizens and those with leave to remain here, including refugees. The Government is considering recent calls to change the current policy and is reviewing the evidence available.
I should also mention that any asylum seeker who would otherwise be destitute is provided with free accommodation, utility bills and council tax paid and a weekly cash allowance with extra money available for mothers and young children.
The cash allowance has been raised from £37.75 to £39.63, representing a rise of 5 per cent from June. It is important to consider that this is significantly higher than general inflation which data showed was 0.8% in the 12 months to April 2020. Indeed, food inflation over the same period was 1.4%.
I know you have concerns over this allowance figure. The methodology used for the cash allowance has been recognised by the Courts as rational and lawful. You may be interested in reading about how this works here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-on-review-of-cash-allowance-paid-to-asylum-seekers.
It is also important to factor in that NHS healthcare and education for children is provided free of charge.
I will continue to monitor closely the support available to asylum seekers to ensure sufficient support is provided.
March 2022
Visa Fees for Non-UK Service Personnel - Amendment 52
Selaine’s response:
There is a long and proud tradition of non-UK service personnel serving in the British Armed Forces. Together with their British and Irish counterparts they defend the UK at home and abroad. The British Armed Forces are renowned and respected around the world and applications from non-UK personnel are always welcome and of a high calibre.
The Ministry of Defence is a modern employer and embraces recruiting talent from all elements of society. The advantages of continuing to have non-UK Service personnel serving in the British Armed Forces,the diversity and skills they bring are hugely valued.
As of 1 October 2020, 9,020 serving personnel across our Armed Forces were of non-UK nationality (Commonwealth and Gurkha and Nepalese) and approximately 500 leave every year.
We did not need this amendment, changing the details of non-UK service personnel visas does not need legislation as the Government is already addressing the costs of visas.
Non-UK service personnel are “exempt from immigration control” during their regular service in the armed forces. Many of these brave men and women who serve our country may wish to stay in the UK after their service and use the skills they have gained during their service to contribute positively to our society. We welcome this.
Those who have served at least four years or have been medically discharged as a result of their service can choose to settle in the UK after their service and pay the standard fee (currently £2,389 per person). Currently, the Home Office charges a fee on each individual who wishes to regularise their immigration status by applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain, more commonly known as settled status.
Compared to others applying for settled status, service personnel applying do not have to meet an income requirement, be sponsored by an employer, or meet any requirements regarding their skills, knowledge of the English language or knowledge of life in the UK. This is already a far more generous route to settlement than their civilian contemporaries.
Earlier this year we recognised that settlement fees place a financial burden on some serving personnel wishing to remain in the UK after their discharge, and the strength of feeling from parliamentarians, service charities and the public about this issue. From 26 May to 7 July this year we ran a consultation on a policy proposal to waive immigration fees for non-UK service personnel wishing to remain in the UK following discharge from service.
Under the draft policy proposal, the UK Government would waive the fee charged by the Home Office when the non-UK service person applies for Indefinite Leave to Remain (or Enter), if they have served in the Regular HM Armed Forces for at least twelve years and wish to settle in the UK following their service.
The Mercer/Jarvis amendment sought to waive VISA fees for all current and former Service Personnel who have served more than four years with the UK Armed Forces and their dependents.
The difficulty with this and reasons why this was not supported are that the four-year threshold is not in line with the initial engagement period of a soldier/sailor/airman and does not reflect the significant investment in their skills and training in their earliest, most formative years. When they join, service personnel sign up for an initial 12 year service period, however, they can opt to leave after the 4 year point. Given this investment, barring medical discharge, we do want service personal to serve for the full 12 years and this could have been an incentive to leave service early. Serving in our armed forces should not be a route for immigration, but immigration to the UK a welcome incentive to encourage service.
In addition, extending the policy to dependents would discriminate against non-UK family members of UK service personnel.
Family members of armed forces personnel are able to apply for settlement once they have completed an initial 5 year period in the UK of limited leave. It would not be fair to extend the fee waiver to the family members of non-UK service personnel because it would discriminate against non-UK family members of UK service personnel. For example, a soldier, sailor or aviator who marries a non-UK spouse must still pay for their migration.
We must balance the need to recognise the service of non-UK Service personnel with the rights of British service personnel. The immigration status of accompanying family members is made clear to non-UK service personnel when they join and throughout their service, support is provided to help them plan for the cost of their families visa fees by the Joining Forces Credit Union service for the armed forces. This was launched under the Armed Forces Covenant in 2015 and offers savings and loan schemes at fair rates through the payroll scheme.
The Government is also considering applying the waiver to any veterans in the UK who have not yet applied for settled status, however the conditions of this would need to reflect the same considerations as the policy for those still serving.
In line with regular Government policy, the proposed policy would not apply retrospectively and there would be no reimbursement of immigration fees for those who have already paid.
Veterans who have not regularised their status can still make a paid application to the Home Office. Even if they do not meet the criteria for settlement, they may be eligible to be granted some form of leave to remain in the UK, which would put them on a route to achieving Settled status in the future and enable them to live and work in the UK.
Under the proposed policy those who have been medically discharged as a result of injury or illness attributable to their service will be eligible to have their immigration fees paid for, irrespective of how long they had served. All applications would still be subject to the standard Home Office eligibility criteria.
I will always stand up for and support our armed forces and our veterans and I trust this Government to do the same, but where legislative changes are proposed, they must be scrutinised for their legal fairness and any unintended consequences.
While the intentions of this amendment were noble, they unfortunately were not universally fair and the proposals being brought forward by the Government, after consultation, are generous and a welcome improvement.
December 2021
Refugee Protection and Safe Routes
Selaine’s response:
In 2015, the Government committed to resettle 20,000 of the most vulnerable refugees who fled the conflict in Syria through the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme (VPRS). It is a welcome fact that the Government has now met that commitment.
In total, across all of our resettlement schemes, the UK has now resettled more than 25,000 vulnerable refugees in need of protection over the past 6 years, with around half being children. These refugees are resettled directly from regions of conflict and instability rather than from safe European countries. I believe that it is most important to prioritise those refugees in dangerous situations, not those already in Europe.
I welcome the fact that the Government already provides safe and legal routes for people needing protection or seeking to reunite with their families. In the year ending December 2020, over 5,400 refugee family reunion visas were issued to partners and children of those previously granted asylum or humanitarian protection in the UK. Over 29,000 family reunion visas have been issued in the last 5 years.
The new Nationality and Borders Bill will allow the UK to continue to resettle genuine refugees directly from places of danger and offer refugee family reunions. It will improve support for refugees to help them build their life in the UK, integrate and become self-sufficient members of society. The Bill also seeks to introduce a new temporary protection status for those who do not come directly to the UK or claim asylum without delay once here but who have, in any event, been recognised as requiring protection.
I have always believed that resettlement is vital as a safe and legal pathway to protection for vulnerable refugees fleeing persecution. It is right that the Government continues to offer safe pathways for those in need, and I will continue to ensure that this is the case. The launch of a new global UK Resettlement Scheme will now build on the success of previous schemes and continue our proud record of resettling refugees who need our help from around the world.
It is also the case that refugees in the UK need to have the freedom to succeed as they settle. This means ensuring refugees have access to the tools required to become fully independent and provide for themselves and their families. This will allow refugees to be in a position to contribute and integrate into the economic and cultural life of the UK.
It is therefore good news that the Home Secretary has announced £14 million of funding to help newly granted refugees to integrate in the UK. This fund will pilot new approaches across the country to support newly granted refugees to learn English, move into work, access housing and build links in their local communities. Lessons learned from these pilots will inform future support available to all refugees.
December 2021
Migrant Channel Crossings
Selaine’s response:
I was deeply saddened by the tragic drownings and loss of life in the Channel. My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who died and the first responders. This awful incident highlights the danger of crossing the Channel by small boat and the ruthlessness of the criminals who are exploiting vulnerable people.
I am determined to bring to justice the ruthless criminal people smugglers whose actions endanger lives. The Home Secretary is taking all action possible to stop criminals exploiting vulnerable people and I offer my support to this important work.
There is a global illegal migration crisis with long-term pull factors and criminal gangs who treat human beings as cargo, and as such there is no quick fix. I fully support the Government’s approach of tackling issues upstream and not simply waiting until people have reached EU countries. The Home Secretary has been extremely clear that she and the Government see co-operation with international partners as essential.
I believe there are two key elements to ending these dangerous crossings - changes to the UK’s asylum system to remove the pull factors and immediate operational and diplomatic work to stop the boat crossings.
The Government’s new plan for immigration will be put into law through the Nationality and Borders Bill. This Bill includes far-reaching reforms to the asylum system to address many of the underlying factors to deter illegal migration. Measures include a one-stop appeals process; the ability to process claims outside the country; the ability to have differentiation and declare inadmissible to our asylum system those who arrive in the UK having passed through safe countries; and life sentences for people smugglers. People should claim asylum in the first safe country they reach, and nobody needs to flee France in order to be safe.
However, the Home Secretary has been clear that we cannot simply wait for the Nationality and Borders Bill to become law. The Government has been taking, and will continue to take, action to prevent crossings now. Co-operation with France has resulted in more than 20,000 crossings being stopped this year with 17 organised criminal groups dismantled and over 400 arrests and 65 convictions.
I know that the Prime Minister and Home Secretary have reached out in the spirit of co-operation to France and other key partners to intensify talks and discussions. The UK has put forward a number of ideas to prevent these dangerous journeys from taking place. These include joint France-UK patrols, maritime patrols, airborne surveillance and the deployment of advanced technology such as ground sensors and radar. I believe it is also vital that action is taken to deepen intelligence sharing to deliver arrests and prosecutions on both sides of the Channel.
This action, both immediate and longer term reflects the Government’s urgency in stopping these crossings, saving lives and securing the UK border.
I hope you can see from this response that the Government is taking firmer action to stop these crossings. I am encouraged by this work but will push the Government to continue to act fast to make this route unviable and to end the cruel and dangerous people-smuggling between France and the UK.
November 2021
The Nationality and Borders Bill
Selaine’s response:
The United Kingdom has a proud record of helping those fleeing persecution, oppression or tyranny from around the world. Alongside providing £10 billion a year to support people through our overseas aid, the UK is a global leader in refugee resettlement. As a country, between 2016 and 2019 we resettled more refugees from outside Europe than any member state of the EU.
In 2015, the Government committed to resettle 20,000 of the most vulnerable refugees who fled the conflict in Syria through the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme (VPRS). I am delighted that the Government has now met that commitment.
In total across all our resettlement schemes, the UK has now resettled more than 25,000 vulnerable refugees in need of protection over the past 6 years, with around half being children. These refugees are resettled directly from regions of conflict and instability rather than from safe European countries. I believe that it is most important to prioritise those refugees in dangerous situations, not those already in Europe.
I welcome the fact that the Government already provides safe and legal routes for people needing protection or seeking to reunite with their families. In the year ending December 2020, over 5,400 refugee family reunion visas were issued to partners and children of those previously granted asylum or humanitarian protection in the UK. Over 29,000 family reunion visas have been issued in the last 5 years.
Let me assure you that the new Nationality and Borders Bill will allow the UK to continue to resettle genuine refugees directly from places of danger and offer refugee family reunions. It will improve support for refugees to help them build their life in the UK, integrate and become self-sufficient members of society. The Bill also seeks to introduce a new temporary protection status for those who do not come directly to the UK or claim asylum without delay once here but who have, in any event, been recognised as requiring protection.
I have always believed that resettlement is vital as a safe and legal pathway to protection for vulnerable refugees fleeing persecution. It is right that the Government continues to offer safe pathways for those in need, and I will continue to ensure that this is the case. The launch of a new global UK Resettlement Scheme will now build on the success of previous schemes and continue our proud record of resettling refugees who need our help from around the world.
It is also the case that refugees in the UK need to have the freedom to succeed as they settle. This means ensuring refugees have access to the tools required to become fully independent and provide for themselves and their families. This will allow refugees to be in a position to contribute and integrate into the economic and cultural life of the UK.
It is therefore good news that the Home Secretary has announced £14 million of funding to help newly granted refugees to integrate in the UK. This fund will pilot new approaches across the country to support newly granted refugees to learn English, move into work, access housing and build links in their local communities. Lessons learned from these pilots will inform future support available to all refugees.
July 2021
Hassockfield Immigration Centre
Selaine’s response:
It is only right that every case is considered individually and kept under constant review - my constituents would expect nothing less. However, I am also very clear that the public does expect the Government to maintain a robust system and immigration detention plays a vital role in this.
As I understand it, the Government is continuing to make progress with plans for an Immigration Removal Centre in Hassockfield. I have been reassured the Home Office will continue to consult with local representatives and the wider community over the coming months, and I will continue to follow this matter closely.
June 2021
Child Refugees
Selaine’s response:
The Government committed to review safe and legal routes to the UK and has a statutory duty to conduct a public consultation on family reunion for unaccompanied asylum-seeking children in the EU. I am pleased that the Government is meeting that statutory duty by completing a comprehensive consultation and engagement process as part of the wider consultation on the New Plan for Immigration, which closed on 6 May 2021. I understand that the Government will consider the consultation responses carefully.
I would like to make the reassurance that the UK already provides a number of routes for children to reunite with family members in the UK under our Immigration Rules. There is published guidance that signposts these existing routes at the following link: www.gov.uk/government/publications/overview-of-family-reunion-options-in-the-immigration-rules
June 2021
The New Plan for Asylum Seekers
Selaine’s response:
The United Kingdom has a proud record of helping those fleeing persecution, oppression and tyranny from around the world. Alongside providing £10 billion a year to support people through our overseas aid, the UK is a global leader in refugee resettlement. As a country, between 2016 and 2019 we resettled more refugees from outside Europe than any member state of the EU. In total across all Government funded resettlement schemes, the UK has resettled more than 25,000 vulnerable refugees in need of protection over the past 6 years, with around half being children. Over 29,000 family reunion visas have also been issued in the last 5 years.
As you are aware, the Home Office has published the New Plan for Immigration which seeks to retain this compassionate approach and combine it with increased fairness, firmness and efficiency. I welcome the ambition to see an asylum system based on need, to better protect and support those who require our help most. I hope you will be reassured to know that the Government is strengthening the safe and legal routes for refugees and fixing historic anomalies in British Nationality law. The Government is also committed to ensuring that resettlement programmes are responsive to emerging international crises and that persecuted minorities are represented. The Plan also helps refugees once they have settled in the UK through support to integrate into society, help in accessing employment and sponsorship programmes.
A key objective of the Plan is also to deter and prevent illegal entry into our country, which will ensure we can prioritise those in genuine need. This will help prevent people making dangerous and unnecessary journeys to the UK through potentially fatal means in small boats or aeroplanes, for example, and also aims to halt the business model of criminal trafficking networks.
The proposals comply with our global obligations, including commitments to the European Convention on Human Rights, the Refugee Convention and the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings. The Home Office has launched a consultation to gain insight from stakeholders and members of the public to inform their strategy, and Ministers are seeking widespread engagement. I would encourage all constituents to take part and ensure their voice is heard, by using the following link: www.gov.uk/government/consultations/new-plan-for-immigration
April 2021
Asylum Seekers Housed at the Barracks
Selaine's response:
The Government takes the welfare of people in Home Office care extremely seriously and is fulfilling statutory duties to ensure decent, safe and humane conditions. The Home Office is required by law to provide asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute with accommodation, paid for by the taxpayer.
Since March, the number of people within the asylum system has risen, because the Government temporarily ceased ending asylum support for those whose claims have been granted or refused. This was necessary to help stop the spread of Covid-19. It has therefore been necessary for the Government to act quickly to source contingency accommodation to create additional capacity and ensure obligations are met in full.
After looking into this, I have been reassured that those accommodated at these sites have access to appropriate medical care, are provided three meals a day, and have access to the 24/7 Migrant Help helpline to raise any issues.
I welcome the action taken by the Government to ensure the UK continues to meet its obligations and commitments to the most vulnerable people. This is of course in the context of unprecedented domestic challenges caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.
February 2021
Coronavirus: Health Care and Immigration
Selaine's response:
As a nation, we have seen courageous and heroic efforts made by all front-line staff during this pandemic and we owe them an immense debt of gratitude. NHS staff have worked bravely and tirelessly to look after our loved ones and they deserve our support.
The Government has taken action to ensure the immigration system does not unduly infringe the ability of the NHS to respond to the Covid-19 pandemic. It is good news that thousands of health professionals and their family dependants will have their visas extended for a year, free of all fees and charges. This will extend the original offer, which gave health professionals a visa extension from 31 March 2020 to 1 October 2020, to 31 March 2021.
Indefinite Leave to Remain is based on a number of requirements, including lawful residence in the UK without excess absences and sufficient knowledge of the English language and life in the UK. Many migrant health professionals already in the UK are likely to be on an immigration route that leads to settlement. It is vital that the core tenets are maintained to provide for successful integration, as this benefits both the UK and overseas workers themselves.
Another area of support which the Government has developed is the new Health and Care Visa. This new Visa creates a fast-track visa route for eligible health and care professionals. There are some key and welcome benefits to this new route, such as a reduced visa application fee, and successful applicants will be exempt from the Immigration Health Surcharge. It is good news that the process will be quick and streamlined.
Finally, the visa extensions are just one part of the Government's response to the Covid-19 pandemic and you may be pleased to know that Ministers have been clear that they continue to consider how best to support the health and social care sector.
January 2021
NHS Staff and Immigration
Selaine's response:
I could not agree with you more that we have seen courageous and heroic efforts made by front-line staff during this pandemic and we owe them an immense debt of gratitude.
I am particularly pleased that the Government has taken action to ensure the immigration system does not unduly infringe the ability of the NHS to respond to the Coronavirus outbreak. A wide of range of people working for the NHS or independent healthcare provider had their visa automatically extended by one year if it was due to expire before 1 October 2020. The Government made sure that the extension was free and the immigration health surcharge did not have to be paid as part of this extension.
I note your concerns regarding the length of this extension, and I have raised these with the Home Office. However, it is important to remember that the visa extensions are just one part of the Government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic and Ministers have been clear that they continue to consider how best to support the health and social care sector. Other areas of support include the bereavement scheme, the exemption from the NHS Surcharge and the new Health and Care Visa.
November 2020
Funding of Fire and Rescue
Selaine's response:
Fire and rescue services across the country have played an essential role in the national effort to tackle Coronavirus. This includes helping other emergency services, aiding vulnerable people and supporting the NHS. It is important to remember that this is of course on top of their usual vital firefighting duties.
Accordingly, the Home Office has launched a £6 million Fire Coronavirus Contingency Fund. This funding will help to support fire and rescue authorities who incur significant costs as a result of taking on additional duties during the coronavirus outbreak. I can assure you that Fire and Rescue Authorities have the necessary funding to respond to incidents. Overall, Fire and Rescue Authorities will receive around £2.3 billion in 2020/21. An additional £6.4 billion in funding has been made available for councils to relieve local pressures and help vulnerable people as councils see fit.
I hope this clarifies the commitment to the Fire and Rescue Authorities, and I will continue to engage with Ministers on this issue.
November 2020
Covert Human Intelligence Bill
Selaine's response:
I appreciate you have concerns about the proposed legislation. This is a very sensitive and important area of the law. As you will be aware, the Bill provides an express legal power for the intelligence agencies, police and a small number of other public authorities to continue to utilise an important tactic for national security and the prevention of serious crime.
Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS) are agents, or undercover officers who may work in the company of criminals or terrorists. CHIS help to secure prosecutions and disruptions by infiltrating these groups. Participation in criminal conduct can be a part of CHIS use. However, this conduct takes place in carefully managed circumstances. This is vital legislation and goes to heart of efforts to keep communities safe from those who seek to do us all harm. The work of CHIS has been critical in disrupting many of the terrorist plots our agencies have stopped. Indeed, in 2018 alone, CHIS led operations allowed the National Crime Agency to disrupt over 30 threats to life, effect numerous arrests of serious organised criminals, seize over 3 tonnes of Class A drugs, safeguard over 200 people, and take almost 60 firearms and 4,000 rounds of ammunition off the street.
I understand you have concerns about safeguards. I would like to be clear that all authorisations are precise and explicit. A CHIS will never be given unlimited authority to commit any or all crimes. Indeed, where a CHIS commits any criminality outside the tight parameters of the authorisation, the prosecuting authorities can consider this in the normal way.
Some constituents have outlined that they believe the Bill will provide sweeping powers. I strongly disagree with this statement. The Government has been clear that there are upper limits to the activity that can be authorised under the Bill. These are contained in the Human Rights Act, including the right to life and the prohibition of torture or subjecting someone to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. It is unlawful for any public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and the legislation makes clear that nothing in the Bill detracts from a public authority’s obligations under the Human Rights Act. Therefore, an act that would be incompatible with the ECHR could not lawfully be granted under this Bill.
I can also assure you that it is not acceptable for an undercover operative to form an intimate sexual relationship with those they are employed to infiltrate and target or those they may encounter during a deployment. The Government has stated clearly that this conduct will never be authorised, nor must it ever be used as a tactic in deployment. This is also made clear through the code of ethics for the police as well as the updated law enforcement agency undercover operative authorised professional practice.
October 2020
Refugees in Greece
Selaine's response:
The UK is working closely with the Greek Government, who retain ultimate responsibility for the situation of migrants in their country. I know Ministers remain committed to supporting Greece's efforts in dealing with the migration challenge including through a United Kingdom Border Force search-and-rescue cutter in the Aegean; and over £510,000 to support the humanitarian needs of migrants on the islands. I welcome that the UK and Greece signed an action plan on migration on 22 April which reaffirms the UK's commitment to continued cooperation to tackle the challenges posed by irregular migration.
I appreciate the concerns you have about migrants on Lesbos following the devastating fire at the Moira Camp. I understand that around 400 unaccompanied children and teenagers have been flown to Thessaloniki in Northern Greece. The Greek Government have also sent ships to help house migrants impacted by the fire. [Optional: I will write to the Foreign Secretary to understand how the UK can help support the Greek Government at this difficult time.
I understand your concerns and agree that when it is safe to do so the UK should recommence refugee resettlement. I welcome the fact that the Home Office is evaluating how to respond and is continuing to discuss this with international and domestic stakeholders. It is important that this is not rushed as plans to restart resettlement are dependent on a number of factors. These include the lifting of restrictions imposed by governments of host refugee countries, local authority and central government capacity and the recovery of the asylum system from the impact of COVID-19. I will continue to push Ministers to restart resettlement as soon as it is safe and practicable to do so.
September 2020
Asylum Support
Selaine's response:
The UK has a proud tradition of providing a place of safety for refugees. Each claim for asylum is carefully considered and where it is found that individuals are in need of protection, asylum is given, with the ultimate aim of helping them to return home if it is safe to do so.
Asylum seekers are allowed to work, in jobs on the Shortage Occupation List, if their claim has not been decided after 12 months through no fault of their own. The current policy aims to strike a balance between being equitable towards asylum seekers, while considering the rights and needs of our society as a whole, prioritising jobs for British citizens and those with leave to remain here, including refugees. The Government is considering recent calls to change the current policy and is reviewing the evidence available.
From the 15 June, the cash allowance was raised by around 5 per cent. It is important to consider that this is significantly higher than general inflation which data showed was 0.8 per cent in the 12 months to April 2020. Indeed, food inflation over the same period was 1.4 per cent.
I know constituents have concerns over this allowance figure. The methodology used for the cash allowance has been recognised by the Courts as rational and lawful. You may be interested in reading about how this works here - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-on-review-of-cash-allowance-paid-to-asylum-seekers.
July 2020
Asylum Seekers and Refugee Resettlement
Selaine's response:
The UK’s resettlement schemes offer a safe and legal route to the UK for the most vulnerable refugees. Over 19,300 people have been resettled through the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme and over 1,700 have been resettled through the Vulnerable Children’s Resettlement Scheme.
The Prime Minister made clear the importance that the Government places on ensuring that unaccompanied children who are seeking international protection in an EU Member State can continue to be reunited with specified family members who are in the UK, as well as children in the UK with family in the EU, following the UK’s exit from the EU. It is also important to note that the UK will continue to reunite unaccompanied children with family members in the UK under the Dublin Regulation during the implementation period, processing and deciding all ‘take back’ requests that have been submitted.
The Government made a statement in March that leaving the EU will not alter the UK’s commitment to family reunification for unaccompanied children. This remains the position. At the first round of the negotiations on the UK-EU future relationship, which also took place in March, our negotiating team outlined the UK's proposals as published in the document ‘The Future Relationship with the EU – The UK’s Approach to Negotiations’. In that document the Government has clearly stated its commitment to negotiate a reciprocal agreement in this area. I understand the EU is now considering the UK's proposals.
https://www.selainesaxby.org.uk/sites/www.selainesaxby.org.uk/files/202…;
June 2020
Immigration Bill
Selaine's response:
When people voted to leave the EU, they did so in the knowledge that the free movement system imposed by the EU would end. The Home Secretary has been clear that she has a particular responsibility to take back control and bring an end to free movement once and for all. To do this, the Government has introduced the Immigration and Social Security Coordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill in the House of Commons. This Bill will end free movement and provide the Government full control of our borders for the first time in many decades.
I welcome the Government’s commitment to build a fairer single, global immigration system which considers people based on their skills, rather than nationality and also reflects the needs of our own jobs market. The Home Office has now released a policy statement outlining that it will replace free movement with the UK’s very own points-based system. This new system will prioritise those with the highest skills and greatest talents, including scientists, engineers, academics and innovators.
I have always believed that the new system is more than simply controlling immigration. I am glad that the Government has committed to reducing the overall levels of migration while ensuring we attract the best and brightest from across the world. This process is also about the creation of a high wage, high skill, high productivity economy. This ambition explains why the Government will not be introducing a general low skilled or temporary work route. I welcome this approach as the UK needs to move away from relying on cheap labour from Europe and focus instead on investment in technology and automation.
Over recent weeks we have all seen our NHS and social care services serve the people of our country with distinction and dedication. I can assure you that our new points based immigration system will not just allow but actively welcome a range of health professionals to the United Kingdom. I welcome the fact that the framework for future immigration will provide the flexibility to adapt to changing times and the Government will ensure the health and care service is supported. The flexibility allowed by having our own immigration system is perhaps one of the most important aspects of the Immigration Bill.
I welcome the Prime Minister's announcement that NHS and care workers will be exempted from the Immigration Health Surcharge fee as soon as possible, as a testament to their inspirational work throughout this crisis. I will continue to monitor this issue closely as more details emerge.
May 2020
Domestic Abuse Bill
Selaine's reponse:
The Government has continued to take action to combat these abhorrent crimes by significantly strengthening our laws and introducing new tools to protect victims.
I welcome the introduction of the Domestic Abuse Bill to Parliament and although not selected to speak in the virtual parliament, I did record my speech which you can view here. The Bill will create a legal definition of domestic abuse to provide clarity that domestic abuse can be financial, verbal and emotional as well as physical and sexual and that critically it is about patterns of abuse over time. Measures in the Bill also include the introduction of new Domestic Abuse Protection Notices and Domestic Abuse Protection Orders to further protect victims and place restrictions on the actions of offenders.
A Domestic Abuse Commissioner has also been appointed to stand up for victims and survivors; raise public awareness; monitor the response of local authorities, the justice system and other statutory agencies; and hold them to account in tackling domestic abuse.
It is vital to emphasise that social distancing does not prevent people from leaving their homes in search of a place of safety if they live in an abusive household. I welcome the fact that the Government and the new Domestic Abuse Commissioner are working closely to ensure charities on the frontline receive a share of the Government's £750 charitable support package. In addition, £2 million has been announced to provide technological support for domestic abuse services and £600,000 to allow victim helplines to remain open for longer.
I will continue to examine the Bill in detail as it progresses through Parliament and will work closely with the Government to help pass the most effective legislation.
May 2020
Windrush Report
Selaine's response:
Commonwealth citizens, like the Windrush generation, are a unique group who have built their life here and have contributed enormously to our country. I do not want anyone to be in any doubt about their right to remain here.
When these people came to the UK they were deemed to be settled in the UK under our legislation at the time. This meant some did not get nor need documentation to prove their right to be here. While the vast majority who came before 1973 will now have documentation that proves their right to be in the UK, there have recently been some cases where people have not been able to get the necessary documentation and have struggled to access public services.
To ensure this can happen as easily and smoothly as possible, the Home Office has set up a new dedicated team to help those people evidence their right to be here. The team will help applicants demonstrate they are entitled to live in the UK, have a dedicated contact point, and will be tasked with resolving cases within two weeks of when the evidence has been provided.
In relation to specific concerns about the report, I understand that the independent adviser, Wendy Williams, has not yet been submitted it to Ministers. I have been assured that once it is available, the Home Secretary will publish her report. I think it is vitally important that the Wendy Williams report is free of political interference.
February 2020
Domestic Abuse Bill
Selaine's response:
Protecting women and girls from violence and supporting victims is of the utmost importance. To support this commitment to tackling violence against women and girls (VAWG), increased funding of £100 million has been pledged.
I welcome the announcement at the Queen’s Speech of the landmark Domestic Abuse Bill, and the Government is fully committed to enacting this vital legislation as soon as possible. I will closely examine the Bill when it comes before the House of Commons to ensure that it protects people as effectively as possible.
The Bill will create a legal definition of domestic abuse to provide clarity that domestic abuse can be financial, verbal and emotional as well as physical and sexual, and that it is about patterns of abuse over time. The Bill will also include the introduction of new Domestic Abuse Protection Notices and Domestic Abuse Protection Orders to further protect victims and place restrictions on the actions of offenders.
I am also happy to see that the Government have allocated nearly £300,000 in extra investment to North Devon Council to support domestic abuse refuge services.
February 2020
Minimum Income Requirement
Selaine's response:
I believe we need rules on bringing spouses from abroad into this country and on family reunion. A balance must be struck between the interests of those who want to bring their spouse to the UK and the interests of the wider UK community.
The Supreme Court has upheld the lawfulness of the minimum income requirement for spouse visas, which has prevented the taxpayer paying more and has helped to promote integration. The Supreme Court also agreed that a fair balance is currently being struck between those wishing to sponsor a spouse to settle in the UK and of the wider community.
That said, the Home Secretary has said that these rules will be kept under review and this question will form part of the Government’s approach to our new immigration regime when it is implemented in January 2021.
January 2020
Support for Trafficked Children
Selaine's response:
Thank you for contacting me about providing support for trafficked children.
We must tackle every form of modern slavery, including human trafficking. It is welcome news that Ministers have secured commitments from other governments and institutions, including the United Nations, the Commonwealth and the EU, to tackle modern slavery, and has successfully lobbied for the establishment of the first ever UN Sustainable Development Goal to end modern slavery. The Government is also working bilaterally with priority countries to deepen law enforcement cooperation.
Guardians provide an additional source of advice and support for all trafficked children. A key part of the role includes one-to-one support for those children who lack a figure of parental responsibility for them in the UK. The ICTG regional practice co-ordinator works alongside statutory bodies such as our police, social workers and the wider Criminal Justice System to build a multi-agency approach to the safeguarding of these vulnerable children.
In 2018, the Home Office announced a review of the Modern Slavery Act, which considered the provisions in the Act regarding Independent Child Trafficking Advocates. You may be pleased to know that in line with the review’s recommendations, the Advocates have been recently renamed Independent Child Trafficking Guardians (ICTGs).
The Government remains committed to rolling out guardians nationally so that more and more children are able to access their rights.
January 2020